Overview

rs1695 is a genetic variant on gene GSTP1 associated with Spondyloepiphyseal dysplasia.

This variant is located on chromosome 11. The variations at position 67585218 are the genetic letters A/A, G/G, T/T, G/T, A/T, A/G

Since humans have each twice (one from each parent), these letter-variations occur on both chromosomes. People can have the same or different letters on both chromosomes. Every person's individual variation combination is referred to as genotype. For variant rs1695 there are 6 currently known genotypes : A/A, G/G, T/T, G/T, A/T or A/G

Short Overview

Variant Location

rs1695 is located on gene GSTP1 in chromsome 11. Use the genome browser to explore the location of rs1695 and its genetic neighbourhood.

Conditions & Traits

rs1695 affects the following conditions and traits:

Pathogenicity

rs1695 affects the following conditions:

Genome Browser

This interactive browser visualizes what no human can see with the naked eye - our DNA. From a down to a specific position on a . The position you are looking at here is the exact location of variant rs on gene GSTP1. Explore more variants and their effects on the body by browsing left and right along the DNA strand.

Loading Genome Browser...

Did you know genetic variants affect drugs?

Mutations are changes in genes and genetic variations are differences in the DNA among people. Variants are tiny changes in just one piece of the DNA while haplotypes are groups of these changes that usually come together.

Dr. Wallerstorfer Dr. Wallerstorfer

Conditions & Traits of rs1695

The different genotypes of variant rs1695 can affect the likelyhood of developing certain traits or conditions. Current research shows that 1 condition and 0 traits are associated with rs1695. The following table shows the relationship between genotypes and conditions and traits.

Classification of Variants

Variants can be classified either based on scientific studies or clinical tests. Scientific studies classifications aim to uncover the function of genetic variants and their role in conditions, traits, and evolution. Variants are categorized according to their functional effect, such as loss-of-function (reduced gene activity), gain-of-function (increased gene activity), neutral (no significant impact) or evolutionary conservation. This classification uses experimental data, population studies, and computational analyses to understand the long-term effects of variants. Clinical testing classifications, however, focus on the immediate health impact on the human body, distinguishing five categories from disease causing (harmful) to no effect (not harmful). This classification relies on a mix of family history, lab tests, and computer predictions, aiming to assist doctors in making medical decisions.

Condition

1

Genotype

A

A

Level of evidence

Sources

No effect

Unisex

2 Sources

Participants: 0

The genotype with the letters A/A is thought to have no effect on your disease risk. Carriers of this genetic result are usually not at risk of developing the disease.

Genotype

G

G

Level of evidence

Sources

No effect

Unisex

2 Sources

Participants: 0

The genotype with the letters G/G is thought to have no effect on your disease risk. Carriers of this genetic result are usually not at risk of developing the disease.

Genotype

A

G

Level of evidence

Sources

No effect

Unisex

2 Sources

Participants: 0

The genotype with the letters A/G is thought to have no effect on your disease risk. Carriers of this genetic result are usually not at risk of developing the disease.

Pharmacogenetics

The genetic variant rs1695 impacts how certain medications work in the body. This difference may cause some of us to require different dosage amounts to achieve the desired effects, while others might experience more apparent side-effects. As a result, healthcare providers may need to adjust prescriptions for those individuals with rs1695. Ultimately, understanding our genetic makeup helps improve the overall effectiveness and usability of medications. Tailoring treatments based on genetics ensures a safer, more personalized healthcare experience.

Genotype
Level of evidence
Impacts
Summary
AA

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype A/A have decreased Drug Effect to CAPECITABINE.

more info

AG

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype A/G have decreased Drug Effect to CAPECITABINE.

more info

GG

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype G/G have increased Drug Effect to CAPECITABINE.

more info

Legend:

Increased

Decreased

No known effect

Genotype
Level of evidence
Impacts
Summary
AA

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype A/A have increased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CISPLATIN.

more info

AG

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype A/G have decreased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CISPLATIN.

more info

GG

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype G/G have decreased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CISPLATIN.

more info

Legend:

Increased

Decreased

No known effect

Genotype
Level of evidence
Impacts
Summary
AA

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype A/A have increased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE.

more info

AG

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype A/G have increased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE.

more info

GG

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Individuals with the genotype G/G have decreased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE.

more info

Legend:

Increased

Decreased

No known effect

Genotype
AA
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype A/A have decreased Drug Effect to CAPECITABINE.

Level of evidence

More info

Genotype
AG
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype A/G have decreased Drug Effect to CAPECITABINE.

Level of evidence

More info

Genotype
GG
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype G/G have increased Drug Effect to CAPECITABINE.

Level of evidence

More info

Legend:

Increased

Decreased

No known effect

Genotype
AA
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype A/A have increased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CISPLATIN.

Level of evidence

More info

Genotype
AG
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype A/G have decreased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CISPLATIN.

Level of evidence

More info

Genotype
GG
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype G/G have decreased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CISPLATIN.

Level of evidence

More info

Legend:

Increased

Decreased

No known effect

Genotype
AA
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype A/A have increased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE.

Level of evidence

More info

Genotype
AG
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype A/G have increased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE.

Level of evidence

More info

Genotype
GG
Impacts

Breakdown

Drug Effect

Side Effects

Dosage

Summary

Individuals with the genotype G/G have decreased Drug Effect and increased Side Effects to CYCLOPHOSPHAMIDE.

Level of evidence

More info

Legend:

Increased

Decreased

No known effect

Drugs related to rs1695

All drugs that are linked to rs1695 are listed here.

Studies and Sources

All of the resources below examine variant rs1695

Association between gene polymorphisms in the cyclophosphamide metabolism pathway with complications after haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (9/23/22)

Paula Muñiz, Cristina Andrés-Zayas, Diego Carbonell, María Chicano, Rebeca Bailén, Gillen Oarbeascoa, Julia Suárez-González, Ignacio Gómez Centurión, Nieves Dorado, David Gallardo, Javier Anguita, Mi Kwon, Jose L. Díez-Martín, Carolina Martínez-Laperche, Ismael Buño

PMC: 9537744
Genetic factors underlying tacrolimus intolerance after liver transplantation (9/30/22)

Yuan Liu, Rui Wang, Peizhen Wen, Wenbin An, Jinxin Zheng, Tao Zhang, Pengshan Zhang, Haoyu Wang, Fan Zou, Hui Pan, Junwei Fan, Zhihai Peng

PMC: 9562471
DISCLAIMER: The materials present on Genopedia.com, such as text, images, graphics, among other items (“Content”), are shared purely for informational reasons. This content should not replace professional health advice, medical diagnoses, or treatment procedures. Whenever you have health concerns or questions, it’s always recommended to engage with your doctor or another appropriate healthcare provider. If you read something on the Genopedia.com site, do not neglect professional medical counsel or delay in obtaining it. In case you believe you’re dealing with a medical crisis, get in touch with your medical professional or call emergency without delay. Genopedia.com doesn’t advocate for any particular medical tests, healthcare providers, products, methods, beliefs, or other data that could be discussed on the site. Please also note that the content, originally written in English and in part created with the help of artificial intelligence, is provided without any warranty, and any reliance on information offered by Genopedia.com, its staff, contributors invited by Genopedia.com, or site users is entirely at your own risk.
Genopedia © 2026 all rights reserved